Comparison of Published Review and Reflective Writing
The published review I looked at for "The Hunting Ground" was The New York Times. Their writing seems to be more open about the film and appears to be more of a summary, whereas my reflective writing is more about the content. Manohla Dargis, who wrote this review, says that the visual aspect of the film is somewhat of a mess. She also reveals that the directors approach to his material is evident in the opener. Her writing seems to focus more on the style of the movie than the actual story, which is how mine was written. I focused on the specific questions I was being asked and looked more into the story line and gave my opinion on that instead of how the film was made. I gave personal opinions whereas it seems that Dargis just gave general ideas and basically just summarized the film.